tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5704749021033728204.post6593894106482666366..comments2008-07-12T04:11:23.950-04:00Experiencehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10863885619501269926noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5704749021033728204.post-59908887395661384642008-07-12T04:11:00.000-04:002008-07-12T04:11:00.000-04:00Well, as great as it would be to power 6000+ light bulbs with that amount of energy per hour, we have to look at efficiency. You said, "assuming that the installation of this technology would be cost effective..." but I don't think it will be. Fitting a large floor with something of that sort must cost quite a bit...<BR/><BR/>No only that, but a complex system like that (especially in it's first stages) is bound to have problems. Is the upkeep cost efficient?<BR/><BR/>As for the items with personal use, I would probably stay away. I have enough trouble with wearing headphones when I run, so I can hardly imagine what a wire from my shoe to my mp3 player would be like. And, unfortunately for me, I have no breasts with which to power an iPod, so that option is out as well...<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, this just sounds like another "green-conscious" failure (ethanol, anyone?).ArjimusMaximushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11346683972938629113noreply@blogger.com